B9: Lobsterlicious
Consider the Lobster by David Foster Wallace was a very
interesting piece of writing. Having never even tasted lobsters before, I
learned a lot about them through the information included in this article. I
had never even thought about how the process of preparing lobsters could be as
big of an ethics issue as slaughter houses and cramped chicken houses. At the
beginning, Wallace introduces the assigned subject of this article: the 2003 Maine
Lobster Festival. Wallace goes off on a lot of tangents
throughout the writing and follows them – he even makes use of footnotes when
he has excessively long tangents that would otherwise confused the reader or
get in the way of the flow of his story. Even though these tangents are related
to his subject of lobsters they often hold different types of information.
Wallace is sure to include a lot of details, descriptions, and definitions. He starts this article
strong with thorough background information of lobsters in general. Then, he
includes ideas of others and conflicting groups (MLF and PETA) on what he
believes could be an enormous morality problem. Wallace invites a lot of different people/ideas to the table to facilitate
the discussion of his question of morality. His purpose of this writing is to
answer his question about the ethics of lobsters and describe his experience at
the Maine Lobster Festival. Throughout the article,
he certainly writes with more of a conversationalist style as seen by
discussion above. He never really finds an answer, which is seen in how he
admits the complexity of the issue. He also has personal bias in how he takes
in the atrocious information that represents lobsters might feel pain because
he is not about to stop eating meat cold turkey. I think that overall this piece
was educational and informative. Wallace was attempting to collect as many facts,
opinions, and research as possible in order to address and answer his question.
He takes what he has learned and evaluates the meaning of each tangent. At the
end, Wallace asks a lot of questions towards the reader/audience: gourmet readers.
I guess he wanted the gourmet readers to morally question what they were doing because
it is what he experienced in the time before, during, and after the 2003 Maine
Lobster Fest. He uses his unclear answer to make his audience question and find
their own answer to the question, making them question their morality.
Comments
Post a Comment