B7: CRA Peer Edit #2
I thought that your paper was very well written and easy to
read. You used a lot of transitions, good vocabulary, and varied sentence
structure, which helped the paper flow and kept it interesting. I liked how you
explained rhetoric in the first paragraph – but it was kind of weird how you
said “_____, also known as pathos” at the end of your essay after using pathos throughout
your writing. I liked how you briefly but thoroughly explained each of your
sources – providing sufficient context. I think that your conclusion could use
a few more sentences but that you summed your thoughts up nicely. You could
mention more about the two sides of Obamacare in your introductory paragraph in
order to provide some information and context before you lay out evidence of
negativity from your Twitter source. I didn’t write this on your paper so I
will say it here: I am not the best at English, so take everything I say with a
grain of salt. I did ask my amazing roommate about capitalization though and I
believe you do need to capitalize Republican because otherwise you are not
referring to the actual conservative party - you are just referring to people
of a republic in general. We could totally be wrong though. I think you did a
great job at comparing the different sources rhetoric and explaining that each
can still be effective in their own way. If you just make a few minor fixes and
add a couple of additional sentences to your conclusion I think that you should
be good. I enjoyed reading your paper because it was easy to follow without
feeling redundant. Great job!
Comments
Post a Comment